TIME Magazine: People Are Living Better

One more interesting article (I am catching up on my TIME Magazine reading for the past month)

The article addresses common dystopian fears that people are living longer but in worse health, thus straining the health system and taking more money from the rest of society.

And that’s another topic I was thinking about a lot recently. When I read books that describe life in a not-so-far-away past (both fiction and non-fiction, especially diary-based), I am constantly stumbling over descriptions of people of my age and even more of Boris’ age as “old” and “very old”, having trouble performing daily activities. And I find it encouraging that that’s a trend, not us being exceptions.

Full text below.

Continue reading “TIME Magazine: People Are Living Better”

Calls For Trump’s Removal

Posting this mostly for my friends abroad, because this kind of news somehow rarely crosses the border. That was yesterday, hours before the seizure deal reached.

From WBEZ, full text below:

Continue reading “Calls For Trump’s Removal”

No Kings Day

This is for my friends outside of the US – i meant to publish it on Sunday, but lost track of time on the departure day!

Time Magazine article

Across big cities and small towns on Saturday, millions of Americans poured into the streets in a sweeping, coordinated protest against President Donald Trump, in what organizers of the “No Kings” movement said could become the largest day of demonstrations in the nation’s history.

From New York to California, and from rural Kentucky to the nation’s capital, demonstrators marched, chanted and waved signs denouncing authoritarian overreach, war in Iran, and an aggressive immigration crackdown that has roiled communities and national politics alike. More than 3,000 events were planned nationwide, with turnout expected to surpass the estimated 5 million to 7 million people who participated in earlier rounds of protests over the past year.

Read more: ‘No Kings’ Protests May Draw Biggest—and Most Diverse—Anti-Trump Crowds Ever

By midday, the flagship rally in Minnesota was already underway, with at least 50,000 people gathered at the State Capitol in St. Paul. Organizers had promised a high-profile lineup of speakers and artists, which included Senator Bernie Sanders, Jane Fonda, and Bruce Springsteen, who performed “Streets of Minneapolis,” a song he wrote in the aftermath of fatal shootings by federal immigration agents in the city that drew national outrage and helped fuel the protest movement.

“Your strength and your commitment told us that this is still America, and this reactionary nightmare and these invasions of American cities will not stand,” Springsteen said to the crowd. “You gave us hope. You gave us courage, and for those who gave their lives, Renée Good, mother of three, brutally murdered, and Alex Pretti, a VA nurse executed by ICE, shot in the back and left to die in the street without even the decency of our lawless government investigating their deaths—their bravery, their sacrifice and their names will not be forgotten.”

Sanders warned of an “unprecedented and dangerous moment in American history.”

“We will not allow this country to descend into authoritarianism or oligarchy in America,” he told the crowd. “We, the people, will rule.”

In New York City, tens of thousands of protestors demonstrated across all five boroughs. The biggest event took place on Seventh Avenue in Manhattan, featuring actor Robert DeNiro, civil rights activist Rev. Al Sharpton and Attorney General of New York Letitia James as speakers.

“We still believe in the core American values of justice, equality, decency, and kindness,” de Niro said. “Because we’re going from the streets to the ballot box and because we all deserve a country with no king.”

Mixed grievances
The demonstrations, organized by a loose coalition of activist groups under the “No Kings” banner, reflected a broad constellation of grievances rather than a single demand. Some protesters aimed their criticism at Congress, chanting “do your job” and carrying signs that mocked lawmakers as timid or unwilling to stand up to the Trump Administration. Protesters pointed to the war in Iran, as well as a protracted government funding standoff over immigration enforcement that has left airport security lines snarled and federal workers unpaid. Many also focused on the Administration’s highly visible immigration raids, while others decried proposed changes to voting laws, environmental rollbacks, and what they see as a steady erosion of democratic norms.

“We have a president that is out of control,” Ken Wyben, a New York City protestor and veteran, told TIME. “All the wars that I’ve been in—and I’ve been in two—we planned it a little better.” He held a sign that read “I served with real leaders. The President is no leader.”

In New York, thousands of marchers began at Columbus Circle and Central Park, eventually spilling into Times Square. Two younger protestors, Natalia and Sailor, both 21, were in the city for only a few days but chose to attend the demonstration to protest Trump’s immigration and border policies.

“Being here, and seeing the majority of people of an older generation really fuels me,” Sailor said, adding that she is just “trying to represent our age group.”

Beatrice Moritz, an immigrant from a family of immigrants, said she attended the protest because she loves America.

“The way people are being treated now is so un-American,” she said. The most pressing issue on her mind was the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, currently under consideration in Congress, which would introduce new identification requirements for voting. “They’re trying to take away our right to vote,” she added.

In Washington, D.C., a stream of protesters marched from Arlington, Va., to the National Mall, beating drums and ringing cowbells as they chanted, “No justice, no peace. No ICE in our streets.” Some carried oversized puppet heads of Administration officials. An inflatable effigy depicting Trump defacing the Constitution made its way through the crowd.

In New York, marchers filled Midtown, spilling into Times Square. In Austin, a small ice sculpture inscribed with “ICE MELTS IN TEXAS” was left to liquefy in the sun. In Boston, protesters erected a memorial honoring children killed in a recent missile strike in Iran, which the U.S. was reportedly responsible for, according to The New York Times.

‘Just a start’
The protests appeared to be largely peaceful, even as a few counterprotests appeared.

Ezra Levin, the co-founder of Indivisible, the progressive coalition behind the protests, called for a nationwide economic protest on May 1, urging supporters to skip work, school and shopping. “We’re going to show up and say we’re putting workers over billionaires and kings,” he said.

Some Democrats echoed the sense of momentum. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer wrote on social media that the protests were drawing “record turnout,” calling them “a very strong sign of what’s coming in November.”

The White House, however, sought to dismiss the demonstrations. A spokeswoman said that “the only people who care about these Trump Derangement Therapy Sessions are the reporters who are paid to cover them.”

Polling in recent days has found Trump’s approval ratings sinking to their lowest levels since he returned to the White House.

Time Magazine: 10-minute walk

Time Magazine: Why should you take a 10-minute walk? I am going to try it 🙂

Full text below.

Continue reading “Time Magazine: 10-minute walk”

I Knew It!

Honestly, when I saw this piece. in WBEZ newsletter, that’s what I wanted to scream: I knew it! I knew that Makela would love our Art Institute! And I love the concept of “music pairing.”

The story.

Continue reading “I Knew It!”

How Low ICE Can Go

ICE arresting Native Americans – I don’t know how much lower they could possibly go!

Continue reading “How Low ICE Can Go”

Long Live Federalism!

Somehow, it’s during Trump’s presidency (both last time and that time) that I especially appreciate the principles upon which our country is built. I already shared this with some of my friends, and now I want to share it with a broader circle: Illinois joined the WHO network after Trump left it. I never knew states could do this, and now I am wondering whether we can join the Paris Accord 🙂

The Tribune article text is below.

Continue reading “Long Live Federalism!”

TIME Magazine: How to be a Nicer Person

A recent Time Magazine article 8 Ways to Become a Nicer Person. I think that at the time when tensions are high, it’s important to know how not to put extra stress on people around you without compromising your values. Full text below:

Continue reading “TIME Magazine: How to be a Nicer Person”

Homeless in Chicago

Last night, when my neighbor and I were returning from a Christmas show in the Auditorium Theater, we passed a long row of cardboard boxes that homeless people used to protect themselves from brutal overnight temperature. Nobody was panhandling. They were just trying to survive till morning.

When we got on the L-train, the first thing I saw in the new was this WBEZ article. Full text below.

As cold weather hits Chicago, Trump’s new policies on homelessness criticized

Feds said they plan to shift $3.9 billion from long-term housing to housing that requires work and addiction treatment. More than 7,500 Illinoisans could lose their permanent housing.

By  Michael PuenteDec 3, 2025, 8:48am CST

For people experiencing homelessness like Ivan Patterson, Monday night’s snow was another reminder to get out of the cold and into a shelter.

“It beats staying under a bridge. It’s too cold to do that,” 52-year-old Patterson said outside the Shelter Placement and Resource Center at 2241 S. Halsted in Pilsen.

The Memphis native said he’s been staying at the shelter for a week even though he holds a job at a nearby Jewel-Osco supermarket.

“I’m trying to get my apartment again, but it’s been tough. It’s too expensive,” Patterson said.

Last month, the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development announced plans to shift $3.9 billion in long-term housing funding to transitional housing requiring work and addiction treatment.

Just as temperatures drop and the city digs out from under record snowfall, housing advocates say that the new policies could put people at risk of losing long-term shelter.

“We believe that over 7,500 people in Illinois are at risk of losing their permanent housing,” Christine Haley, chief homeless officer for the Illinois Department of Human Services, said Tuesday.

“The Trump administration is moving away from housing first. We’ve seen that this was on the horizon … in a few different ways,” she said. “Through the president’s executive order to fight crime, it talked about moving away from housing first. It talked about utilizing grants as a way to implement this new piece of really criminalizing homelessness.”

On any given day in Chicago, more than 1,300 people are unsheltered, according to a snapshot taken earlier this year by the city.

In a statement, HUD said its new policies restore “accountability to homelessness programs and promote self-sufficiency among vulnerable Americans.”

But Haley said the lack of affordable housing is what is driving homelessness.

“That is the true cause of homelessness, our lack of affordable housing, lack of income to be able to afford market-rate rent,” she said.

Mark Ishaug, head of Chicago-based Thresholds, said the change in federal housing policies could force many to the streets, even during cold weather. He said that includes people of color, older adults and people with disabilities, including those with mental illness and substance abuse issues.

“We are already in a housing and homeless crisis in Chicago. If this policy were to go into effect, it would take us from crisis to catastrophe,” Ishaug said. “There are thousands of people living on the streets today. … So if we have a problem now, which we do, and a crisis now, we are moving to catastrophe.”

La Casa Norte clients, who stay in La Casa Norte shelters and requested that their name be kept private, interact at La Casa Norte’s North Avenue drop-in center in Humboldt Park, Tuesday, Dec. 2, 2025. | Pat Nabong/Sun-Times
La Casa Norte clients go over paperwork at the agency’s North Avenue drop-in center in Humboldt Park.

Jonah Storr, associate director of programs for La Casa Norte in Humboldt Park, said it’s been an especially difficult time finding shelter for young people who are homeless.

“We see teenagers or young people who have been kicked out of their homes, or maybe have gone through the foster system and have aged out at 18. People end up here through all sorts of reasons, including young people who are trying to make it on their own,” said Storr, whose agency assists people ages 16 to 24.

Julian Martinez was standing outside the shelter placement center Tuesday afternoon smoking a cigarette. He’s been homeless for three years.

“It’s definitely hard if you ain’t got nobody out here and helping with your family,” Martinez, 23, said.

The father of a 4-year-old daughter, Martinez said he holds down a job as a landscaper, but the $200 a week he makes isn’t enough to pay rent. He’d been staying at the center for nine days.

“I usually sleep outside,” he said.

Kenyatta Mays, 56, who uses a wheelchair, said many people think he’s panhandling when he’s sitting outside the shelter on a smoking break.

Kenyatta Mays, 56, smokes a cigarette outside the Shelter Placement and Resource Center in Pilsen.
Kenyatta Mays, 56, smokes a cigarette outside the Shelter Placement and Resource Center in Pilsen.

“I’m just here to get off the street. It’s too cold,” Mays said.

The Lifestyle Creep

This is a part of a newsletter from my wealth management company. I was hesitant about sharing this article because the way it is written implies it concerns only very well off people, so I felt like it will be perceived as “rich people problem.” Still, I believe that the issue is rather universal, and that any time someone experience a substantial increase in income, there is a possibility of the “lifestyle creep.” I think, that stories about people who won a lottery and soon found themselves broke, can be attributed to the same effect.

Here is how this article starts:

Lifestyle creep happens when your expenses increase alongside your income. As you earn more, it’s easy to spend more freely, perhaps without much thought. As income increases, it’s only natural to want to improve your lifestyle, and there’s nothing inherently wrong with that, either, up to a point. Without keeping tabs on the cumulative effect of daily financial decisions like business class upgrades or pricey dinners, it’s easy to lose track of how much you’re saving versus spending. After all, as the name suggests, lifestyle creep happens slowly.

For high earners, there’s enough cash coming in that makes it easy to cover just about any upgrade, so the cost can seem small when considering the big picture. But unless you’re tracking your saving and spending, you risk getting used to a lifestyle that you can’t support once you stop working. So the key to enjoying your success now — and maintaining that standard later — is ensuring your savings rate increases at least as much as your additional spending.

I do not want to cite practical calculation examples from this article, because most people do not have that kind of money, but the general idea is that when a person ‘s income increases substantially, they should use not more than half of this increase for “quality of life improvement” (actually, they recommend 30-40%), and the rest should go to increasing the retirement savings. Again, the principle behind it is that people expect to maintain the same lifestyle after retirement as they had before, so they should budget for that.

The final paragraph of the article reads:

You can only spend a dollar once. But there’s also no prize for being the richest person in the graveyard. Being intentional about how you spend and save your money can help you maximize both. So before upgrading to business class, run the numbers to see how all your incremental lifestyle improvements add up relative to your savings.

I think that balancing between these two (“enjoy the day” and “richest person in the graveyard”) is indeed difficult, and I do not think I always make right decisions. But I know since the time I was very poor (and it happened to me more than once during my lifetime) that budgeting is critical, and good budgeting can improve one’s life more than moderate pay increase. Of course, I am not talking about people leaving below the poverty level, and of course, I am not implying that everyone should be happy with what they have. It’s the season of giving, after all.

Well, I really hope I didn’t offend anybody, and I hope that I was able to express my thoughts.